Building Wealth Through Employee Stock: USA vs Europe

Hello friends, and welcome to The Unsophisticated Investor! Brought to you by Scott & Rob, the founders of Shuttle!

If you want to be one of the first to get access to some of the most exclusive private market investment opportunities in Europe, join our limited waitlist now.

Now, let’s get into it 👇

The dream of achieving financial freedom through your company stock is one held by many working in the tech sector. Stories of early employees sticking it out at what are now behemoth companies are common, and the idea of your stock grants growing in value to a level which might allow you to retire, or at least not worry too much about your future earnings is one we can all get behind. A recent survey conducted by NVIDIA reported that 78% of their employees are now millionaires with one in two being worth over $25million! Insane!!

But before you hand in your notice and start applying to NVIDIA, for tech workers in Europe, this dream remains elusive due to fundamental differences in how employee stock options and purchase plans are taxed and regulated.

So let’s explore the differences between Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPPs), and how the tax landscape in countries like Ireland and other parts of Europe creates significant barriers to wealth accumulation.

Understanding Stock Plans: ESOPs vs. ESPPs

First things first, before we dive into taxation, it's important to understand the two common types of stock plans available to employees.

1. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP):

   • An ESOP gives employees shares in their company, typically at no cost.

   • Employees earn equity over time and may receive their full stake when they leave, retire, or the company is sold.

   • ESOPs are common in privately-held or closely-held companies and offer long-term wealth-building opportunities.

2. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP):

   • An ESPP allows employees to buy company stock, often at a discount (usually 10-15%).

   • Employees contribute part of their salary to buy these shares and can profit immediately from the discount if they sell quickly.

   • ESPPs are more common in publicly traded companies and cater to shorter-term gains.

Both plans offer unique opportunities, but how employees benefit depends heavily on local tax policies.

How Stock Plans are Taxed: The US vs. Europe

The US offers a relatively favourable environment for stock plans. Many employees in the US can participate in Incentive Stock Options (ISOs), where taxes are deferred until shares are sold and gains are taxed at lower long-term capital gains rates (15-20%). Employees often pay no tax when options are granted or exercised as long as certain conditions are met. This means they can take advantage of the discounted rate and then let those stocks sit and appreciate in value without being taxed.

By contrast, European countries impose high and complex taxes on stock plans, usually when they’re exercised, often discouraging employees from taking full advantage of them. Let’s break down the key issues:

1. Timing of Taxation

One of the biggest differences is when tax becomes due. Ideally, employees should only pay taxes when they have a cash benefit in hand, typically after selling shares. However, in many European countries, taxes are due at the time of option exercise or even at the time of grant.

Examples:

• United States: Taxes are often deferred until shares are sold. Employees can hold shares long-term and pay lower capital gains tax rates.

• Ireland: Employees pay Income Tax, Universal Social Charge (USC), and Pay-Related Social Insurance (PRSI) immediately upon exercise of options. They must pay these taxes even if they don’t sell the shares, creating a cash flow issue. 

• Belgium: Taxes are due when options are granted, regardless of whether they ever generate a profit. This effectively discourages the use of stock options entirely.

In other European countries like Denmark, Finland, and Norway, employees face double taxation: once at exercise and again at sale.

2. Tax Rates

Another major issue is how stock-related income is taxed. In many European countries, stock options are taxed as ordinary income, with rates as high as 50-64%, compared to much lower capital gains rates in the US.

• Countries like Germany, Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland tax employee stock income at high marginal rates.

• In Ireland, income tax, USC, and PRSI combine to create an effective tax rate that can exceed 50% at exercise. Additionally, when shares are eventually sold, employees face a 33% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on any further gains.

In contrast, US employees often benefit from long-term capital gains tax rates, which are significantly lower than income tax rates. This incentivizes holding onto shares for wealth accumulation.

3. Bureaucracy and Compliance

In addition to high taxes, European employees and companies face significant administrative burdens when offering stock plans. Countries often require extensive documentation, regulatory approval, and complex reporting, discouraging smaller startups from offering stock options at all.

The US, by comparison, has a more streamlined approach, particularly in startup-friendly regions like Silicon Valley. Stock options are a standard part of compensation packages for tech employees and are supported by investor-friendly tax rules.

Why European Tech Employees Are at a Disadvantage

These tax and administrative hurdles make it difficult for European employees to build wealth through stock ownership. Here’s why:

1. High Upfront Tax Liability:

   • In countries like Ireland, employees must pay significant taxes at the time of exercise, often without the cash flow to cover it unless they immediately sell shares.

2. Reduced Incentive to Hold Shares:

   • Due to the lack of capital gains tax advantages, employees are less motivated to hold shares long-term, which reduces their potential for wealth accumulation.

3. Fewer Stock Plans Available:

   • Many European startups avoid offering stock options due to the complexity and cost of compliance. This limits employees' access to equity opportunities.

What Can Be Done?

Some European countries have recognised the problem and introduced reforms to encourage employee ownership. For example, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have optimized their tax systems to support stock plans. France and Portugal have also made improvements, offering more favourable conditions than many of their neighbours.

But broader reforms are needed across Europe if wer want to compete with the US in attracting and retaining top talent through equity incentives. Simplifying taxation and reducing upfront tax liabilities would be a significant step toward levelling the playing field.

Conclusion

The difference in tax treatment between the US and Europe explains why stories of tech employees becoming millionaires are common in Silicon Valley but rare in Europe. While the US system rewards long-term ownership and capital growth, many European countries hinder wealth-building with high taxes, poor timing of taxation, and excessive bureaucracy.

Until Europe modernises its approach to employee stock plans, the dream of building significant wealth through employee equity will remain largely out of reach for many of its tech workers.

What we’ve been working on at Shuttle

• In London for meetings this week 🇬🇧

• Final tweaks to the platform for Shuttles next launch 🚀

• Finale stages of negotiations with a new payments partner 💸

The Unsophisticated Investor is brought to you by Scott & Rob, the founders of Shuttle. We’re both sick of private markets being a playground exclusive to the ultra-wealthy so we started a company to challenge the status-quo. Shuttle’s singular focus is to unlock private markets for Millennial and Gen Z retail investors and help them build wealth through the highest performing private market opportunities.

Scott & Rob
Shuttle Co-Founders